>NOOOOOO YOU CAN'T POINT OUT HOW SOMETHING IS STUPID!!! YOU MUST TURN OF YOUR BRAIN AND CONSOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!!!
Mechs are stupid, and you're stupid for liking them.
I'm really sorry that tanks and helicopters just became obsolete. It's all drone now. Maybe a rare IFV. You always can play World Of Unrealistic Armored Boxes.
Because nothing lasts forever under the moon.
"Oh no, heavier-than-air vehicles are impossible."
"Cavalry is viable against machine guns."
And if you want to talk about laws of physics, try to explain viability of "space fighter".
We can't predict what the future holds, and right now an exoskeleton with a jetpack would be much more useful than a tank. However, we don't have the capacity to fill that niche.
>"B-but it might happen in the future!"
No, it won't.
>space fighter
I don't know what point you're trying to make by bringing up something that's even more moronic, but okay.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>No, it won't.
If we could have built Armored Core, we would have used it yesterday. Something that can fly under radar, take off and land instantly, and take a few hits. It just so happens that feet are the best landing gear.
>I don't know what point you're trying to make by bringing up something that's even more moronic, but okay.
It makes all space trucking games just as unrealistic as mecha games, pure wish fulfilment, and it's not a bad thing. Just like very popular "tank-on-tank" genre.
Otherwise all we have is drones and artillery, and everything more is a copping zone.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>If we could have built Armored Core, we would have used it yesterday.
And it would be immediately discontinued once it became clear it's a comically impractical waste of money and resources.
>and it's not a bad thing.
Yes it is.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>And it would be immediately discontinued once it became clear it's a comically impractical waste of money and resources.
But enough about. helicopters.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Helicopters are actually useful though. You keep trying to liken the nonsensical nature of mechs to real world vehicles that are actually practical, and it just makes you look like an idiot.
8 months ago
Anonymous
In logistic, maybe. US forces try to fit them in every hole, just because the military wants to use their big shiny toy. They are completely useless if the opponent has any form of parity. They're only useful in police operations.
They ate shit in two different yet equally pathetic Shitholestans.
You, in turn, have failed to attack even one of my arguments. You don't know enough yet you think you can make some kind of judgment.
Mechs could be nonsensical, yet you can't even defend your winning position.
At the end of the day, we can't predict the future even in the short term, an army can keep something completely useless in service for decades (A-10) and will use the weapon long after it is completely obsolete.
It's a clown world, and mechs fit in here.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>huuuuuuur being able to transport things by flight is completely useless!
Okay, keep on with your insane delusions that inherently moronic ideas could maybe make sens one day if the laws of physics magically change. moron.
8 months ago
Anonymous
You should invest in reading comprehension. It will do you well.
8 months ago
Anonymous
There's nothing to comprehend. You are spewing complete nonsense. You say I'm attacking any of your points? You don't have any points, and you're trying to claim that helicopters are useless. Frick you and die.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Dude, wake up. You can't read lol. You can't comprehend simple logic. Maybe this is why you are so aggressive. Dumbasses are like that.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Not that anon but mechs, or at the very least something with manipulators like how mechs have arms, is an incredibly practical device that adds more staying power to your fighting force. Your tank/helicopter/jet/humvee run out of ammo and it's time to head back to the base. Your giga armed vehicle runs out of ammo and it can start using the gun as a club, or chuck it as a projectile weapon, or start uprooting trees to chuck as projectile weapons. That means the ammo it started out with is one less factor that determines whether it stays in the field or goes back to HQ.
8 months ago
Anonymous
All the money required to make that monstrosity could be put into more soldiers and anti-material weapons. Oh wow, mechs have arms. You know what else they have? Outrageous maintenance costs.
>You know what else they have? Outrageous maintenance costs.
Considering the only "real" source we have for mech maintenance costs are fees from videogames where cost is based on HP lost + solid ammunition spent, it can be anywhere between absoluitely free and more than a village worth of arms and a legs. I wouldn't really be talking about maintenance costs for the fictional vehicles.
Besides, expensive maintenance costs is a military staple. The training and maintenance cost for an Abrams tank can top up at $10 million bucks per tank, according to google.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>Besides, expensive maintenance costs is a military staple. The training and maintenance cost for an Abrams tank can top up at $10 million bucks per tank, according to google.
Yeah, and the tank doesn't have limbs, dumbass. If it did, it'd bankrupt the country.
>I wouldn't really be talking about maintenance costs for the fictional vehicles.
And here we start with this fricking shit. Just because it's fictional, that means it's perfectly okay for something to be idiotic nonsense. Frick you.
8 months ago
Anonymous
My guy, we have vehicles with rudimentary "not for chucking" limbs in the form of cranes, excavators, and even that thing that uproots trees to feed into those moving sawmills that they use in rainforests. None of those bankrupt the companies that employ them.
You'll have to explain the math you did where these devices that these companies use go from "we can use these in our company and earn profits" to "holy shit it's bankrupting a whole country" just because some engineers turned it into a trebuchet that can also grab stuff.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>None of those bankrupt the companies that employ them.
None of those things are able to walk and fly, moron.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Good thing I said "or at the very least, vehicles with manipulators akin to a mech's arms" then, didn't I?
8 months ago
Anonymous
Frick your backpedaling. Mechs are logistically unfeaseable. Period. And that's before we get to the part where they're physically impossible. I will never understand why you blithering morons are so adamant in defending this utterly stupid concept. >"Because it's cool!"
No it isn't. There's nothing cool about nonsensical prostituteshit that literally cannot work under any circumstances.
8 months ago
Anonymous
It's not backpedaling moron. I outright specified the practical use of limb like manipulators for a military vehicle.
>And that's before we get to the part where they're physically impossible
We have literally been making weapons that throw things over great distances long before we invented tanks, like a catapult or a trebuchet. Impossible my ass.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>It's not backpedaling moron. I outright specified the practical use of limb like manipulators for a military vehicle.
And what happens when said manipulators are instantly shot off like the nice big target they are, dumbass?
>the moron is actually, ACTUALLY comparing catapults to giant fricking robots
... I can't. I just fricking can't with you subhumans.
8 months ago
Anonymous
How often do Abrams tanks with their "nice big target" axial guns get shot off?
8 months ago
Anonymous
> If it did, it'd bankrupt the country.
They had the resources to teach a tard like you to read. Couldn't be cheap. I think they'll be fine.
It's not an argument, it's objective fact. Mechs are nonsensical and do not belong in fiction because their depiction is a form of misinformation. That's simply how it is.
They absolutely do. There are people who think Thanos is both real and had sound reasoning for fricks sake!
8 months ago
Anonymous
If Thanos was real he would have snapped you out of existence, also >capeshit
8 months ago
Anonymous
Capeshit is the reason why people are so stupid that they unironically believe that this bullshit is real. Mechslop is threatening to bring about a second wave of mass delusion.
It's not an argument, it's objective fact. Mechs are nonsensical and do not belong in fiction because their depiction is a form of misinformation. That's simply how it is.
for being misinformed that mecha is fiction for fun and toys.
You first. You're the one who refuses to engage with the topic and instead got immediately butthurt that someone pointed out that your fictional toys make no goddamn sense.
>You ever think about how mechs are an inherently moronic concept?
Mechs are not an inherently moronic concept. The idea of an all terrain mobile weapon resistant to all forms of attack besides another one of itself is logistically extremely viable for warfare. In addition, the idea of a humanoid modular system that can be customized for virtually any type of mission further adds credibility for their viability.
>resistant to all forms off attack
Unless you, y'know, bring a rope. Such a mighty machine until the stupid thing trips. moron.
8 months ago
Anonymous
That "rope" is going to have to be an extremely long carbon fiber tube or it's going to just immediately snap.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>using your brain is a sign of insecurity
You should certainly start doing it.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>using your brain to debunk stylized power fantasy fiction thats simply a narrative vehicle makes you a billion IQ gigachad
How about you start b***hing and moaning about magic not making sense, or space combat with giant battleships being a waste of resources over simple long range railgun ballistics delivery? Go wank off to leaked military blueprints and go back to playing War Thunder.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Why does it always boil down to "MUH FUN" with you brainless c**ts? I swear, at this point it's more a matter of you having no self-respect than anything.
Also, bold of you to make the assumption that any of that other shit is acceptable either.
8 months ago
Anonymous
The fact you think all fiction has to subscribe to one standard of reality makes you such a goddamn lolcow.
8 months ago
Anonymous
The fact you think it's okay for fiction to insult the audience's intelligence makes you a moronic sheep.
8 months ago
Anonymous
You must have such a fantastic variety of military sims and car games you like to play, dad.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>I hate fun
Cuckmann, is that you?
8 months ago
Anonymous
You must have such a fantastic variety of military sims and car games you like to play, dad.
Answer the question, coward. It's extremely telling that you always justify games directly calling you a moron by citing "fun".
8 months ago
Anonymous
1 5 8 2 6 0 5 1 6 8 3 6 1 8 0 3 6
8 months ago
Anonymous
I don't give a shit about whatever spergout you're having with that anon. I just chimed in and called you Cuckmann because of your whole thing against fun, like how he said "we don't use the word fun" over at Naughty Dog.
>still avoiding answering the question
I accept your concession, sheep.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>hurr you conceded
Nah anon. We provided you an argument. You just need to use your brain to decipher it. We wouldn't want to insult your intelligence, after all.
8 months ago
Anonymous
The only concessions you take are in the candy aisle at the supermarket.
8 months ago
Anonymous
I don't give a shit about whatever spergout you're having with that anon. I just chimed in and called you Cuckmann because of your whole thing against fun, like how he said "we don't use the word fun" over at Naughty Dog.
8 months ago
Anonymous
You don't want an answer, you sad little autist. You were just wanting validation for your shit takes.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>hurr you conceded
Nah anon. We provided you an argument. You just need to use your brain to decipher it. We wouldn't want to insult your intelligence, after all.
The only concessions you take are in the candy aisle at the supermarket.
>STILL avoiding answering the question
Why do you justify a game insulting your intelligence by citing "it's fun"?
8 months ago
Anonymous
Oh no. It appears you can't decipher the argument provided. Would you like us to dumb it down for you?
8 months ago
Anonymous
You are not providing an argument, you are continually avoiding answering a basic question.
8 months ago
Anonymous
And you are continually failing to understand a basic answer in spite of the replies doing their best to not insult your intelligence.
8 months ago
Anonymous
And you are now not even understanding the difference between a question and answer, GPT-kun.
8 months ago
Anonymous
I understand just fine moron kun. You asked us why people always respond with how something is fun, and bemoaning your perceived insult to our collective intelligence. You've been provided answers designed to not insult your intelligence, but the meaning behind them continues to elude you, as though we need to insult what intelligence you claim to have by dumbing things down to where an infant can understand.
8 months ago
Anonymous
A rhetorical question is a statement, not a question. It doesn't need to be answered.
However, I can certainly infer your IQ from the moronic way you "argue" i.e. by flinging shit and hoping your nonsense sticks.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Oh it's not a rhetorical question. I'm genuinely asking, but you're too much of a b***h ass coward to answer it.
And you are continually failing to understand a basic answer in spite of the replies doing their best to not insult your intelligence.
You still haven't answered the question.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Wait a second... that posting style and arguments...I know who you are!
You are the mecha guy spamming that Nier Automata picture sperging, probably the same guy that spergs at crossovers and science fantasy.
Leave the thread, anons, this guy won't listen. No point arguing further.
8 months ago
Anonymous
This guy is amusingly moronic, anon. I don't think they even understand that they're autistically insinuating all fiction (no matter how unrelated) should adhere to a unified standard of physics, and that the whole point of fiction being a media to entertain and intrigue is NOT a valid excuse.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>insinuating
No, I'm outright saying that. Do not put this stupid shit in your story, period.
>Go ahead and answer the question again then.
But if we did that you'd have to concede that there are situations where "insulting your intelligence" is a necessity, and I wouldn't want to do that. You'll have to piece the puzzle together on your own. It'll be more rewarding that way.
There is absolutely no scenario in which insulting the audience's intelligence is justified.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>There is absolutely no scenario in which insulting the audience's intelligence is justified.
And yet you're providing a scenario right now. You want all the puzzle solving removed from the responses provided to you because you couldn't figure out how the replies you received answered your question.
8 months ago
Anonymous
I don't want to solve some imaginary puzzle. I want you to tell me why you fricktarded sheep are okay with a work of fiction treating you like babies jingling keys in front of your faces.
I'm replying to him purely because it's funny to make him screech. Nothing more, nothing less.
have a nice day. You will never have the moral high ground because I can feel you desperately avoiding that Battlefield V post.
8 months ago
Anonymous
The fact that you think it's imaginary when you've been told countless times that it isn't does little to disprove that there are situations wherein your intelligence needs insulting.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>"If I keep saying that I'm not being a gaslighting c**t, that'll make it true!"
Okay, I accept your concession. You love the taste of corporate wiener, and honest discussion is a foreign concept to you. Y'know, it's really my own fault for trying to have a real conversation on this piece of shit website in the first place.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>My argument isn't wrong you're gaslighting me
And here's where I accept your concession. One day maybe you'll me smart enough to piece it together. I doubt it though.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Buddy, I got some bad news. I'm not the one who was talking to you about Battlefield V. Take your meds.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Again, why are you lying?
>My argument isn't wrong you're gaslighting me
And here's where I accept your concession. One day maybe you'll me smart enough to piece it together. I doubt it though.
If you really did answer my question, you can damn well prove it by simply answering it again. But you literally can't because you fricking didn't. Go die.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>answer my question >answer my question >ANSWER MY QUESTION
hi broken record, my name is lol
8 months ago
Anonymous
>"A HUUUUUUUUR I LOVE WHEN GAME DEVS CALL ME A moron!! KEYS JINGLY A DUUUR HUUURR HUUUUURRRRRrrrrRRRRR*drool*"
have a nice day.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Anon, answering your question just proves us right by the fact that you had to have it spelled out for you instead of you being able to piece it together. In other words, it's to this threads amusement and mirth that you, Mr. "Grr you shouldn't like things insulting your intelligence" are now begging to have your intelligence insulted by asking to be spoonfed the answer.
So nah. figure it out by yourself and we'll keep laughing each time you say "no you didn't answer it, now answer me".
8 months ago
Anonymous
>"I know I have no real argument, so I'll just keep up this bullshit."
This is why you "people" have a containment board. Frick off back to /m/ already.
8 months ago
Anonymous
You already tried this with
>"If I keep saying that I'm not being a gaslighting c**t, that'll make it true!"
Okay, I accept your concession. You love the taste of corporate wiener, and honest discussion is a foreign concept to you. Y'know, it's really my own fault for trying to have a real conversation on this piece of shit website in the first place.
You were wrong then and you're still wrong now.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>"Your objectively correct assertion that mechs are unrealistic is wrong because... because it just is, okay?!"
Uh huh.
8 months ago
Anonymous
I'm replying to him purely because it's funny to make him screech. Nothing more, nothing less.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Because I'm not so emotionally fragile like you to confuse my feelings for reason and take fictional universes as an affront to my very being to the point of argument if it acts as an entertaining means of framing a world and story in a genre of video game I like.
But I still don't think you wanted an answer, you just want to feel like your shit opinion matters on a Mongolian fish-fricking conference room.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Again, fiction is not an excuse to depict stupid shit. That is straight up misinformation, and that's immoral, dammit.
I understand just fine moron kun. You asked us why people always respond with how something is fun, and bemoaning your perceived insult to our collective intelligence. You've been provided answers designed to not insult your intelligence, but the meaning behind them continues to elude you, as though we need to insult what intelligence you claim to have by dumbing things down to where an infant can understand.
Not one word of that actually answered the question.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>Not one word of that actually answered the question.
The posts continuously have. Maybe you're just too dumb to understand the answer.
8 months ago
Anonymous
So fiction needs a disclaimer on it that it's fiction because someone might think clearly fictional concepts depicted within are based in reality and... do something?
...What are you even doing on Ganker.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Fiction needs to not have any of that shit in it at all.
>No they haven't.
Yes they have anon. Come on, use that big so-called intelligent brain you have. You can piece the answer together.
Go ahead and answer the question again then.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>Go ahead and answer the question again then.
But if we did that you'd have to concede that there are situations where "insulting your intelligence" is a necessity, and I wouldn't want to do that. You'll have to piece the puzzle together on your own. It'll be more rewarding that way.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>Because I'm not so emotionally fragile like you to confuse my feelings for reason and take fictional universes as an affront to my very being to the point of argument if it acts as an entertaining means of framing a world and story in a genre of video game I like. >meanwhile, pic related
... homie, why you lyin'?
>Not one word of that actually answered the question.
The posts continuously have. Maybe you're just too dumb to understand the answer.
The posts continuously have.
No they haven't. All you tards have said is essentially "NUH UH!" and failed to elaborate.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>No they haven't.
Yes they have anon. Come on, use that big so-called intelligent brain you have. You can piece the answer together.
>Terada still tweets stuff like "if I say anything OG related people wil start demanding the final game" even though he's not even in the company anymore.
Also, the moment he left marked the end of the franchise. It's forever gacha garbage now
Idk, what kind of weapon are you going to use when you're trying to defend and enforce land inside an O'Niell Cylinder, and any stray projectile could cause explosive decompression for the entire space colony?
Personally, I'd want something big with arms that can be used for both construction and melee combat, and legs capable of crossing any type of terrain, while being familiar and intuitive to control
>You ever think about how mechs are an inherently moronic concept?
Mechs are not an inherently moronic concept. The idea of an all terrain mobile weapon resistant to all forms of attack besides another one of itself is logistically extremely viable for warfare. In addition, the idea of a humanoid modular system that can be customized for virtually any type of mission further adds credibility for their viability.
Duh. Why do you think no real military has ever adopted them on a wide scale?
>the idea of a humanoid modular system that can be customized for virtually any type of mission further adds credibility for their viability. >blow leg off
There goes your viability.
>There goes your viability.
You mean like how a chopper isn't viable anymore if you shoot its tail off? Or a tank ends up being a glorified turret if its treads get fricked?
Besides, if you're gonna b***h about mechs being "expensive" because they can walk and fly like you did in
>None of those bankrupt the companies that employ them.
None of those things are able to walk and fly, moron.
then a mech with its leg blown off will just fly homie.
>You mean like how a chopper isn't viable anymore if you shoot its tail off?
Choppers aren't meant to be frontline armor units like tanks. >Or a tank ends up being a glorified turret if its treads get fricked?
That's still better than a disabled mech.
>a glorified gun emplacement is better than a walking flying shooting thing that you just pissed off and made into a dedicated flying thing
The mind of tankgays, everyone.
Specialized units paired with other specialized units of different designs and specialties beat over-engineered jacks of all trades.
8 months ago
Anonymous
>2 things being crippled by shooting their ONE means of mobility is better than one thing that can still fight due to having 2 means of locomotion
The mind of tankgays, everyone.
I think Lockheed Martin are ready to unveil the gundam and trying to pre-emptively discredit the opposition. Godspeed, god's tardiest warrior. Fricking rope, lol.
>SRW OG
This is a false flag
>NOOOOOO YOU CAN'T POINT OUT HOW SOMETHING IS STUPID!!! YOU MUST TURN OF YOUR BRAIN AND CONSOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!!!
Mechs are stupid, and you're stupid for liking them.
have a nice day moron baiter, you could have made a good thread but you chose this
I'm really sorry that tanks and helicopters just became obsolete. It's all drone now. Maybe a rare IFV. You always can play World Of Unrealistic Armored Boxes.
The frick do tanks and helicopters have to do with mechs being a dumb concept?
Because nothing lasts forever under the moon.
"Oh no, heavier-than-air vehicles are impossible."
"Cavalry is viable against machine guns."
And if you want to talk about laws of physics, try to explain viability of "space fighter".
We can't predict what the future holds, and right now an exoskeleton with a jetpack would be much more useful than a tank. However, we don't have the capacity to fill that niche.
>"B-but it might happen in the future!"
No, it won't.
>space fighter
I don't know what point you're trying to make by bringing up something that's even more moronic, but okay.
>No, it won't.
If we could have built Armored Core, we would have used it yesterday. Something that can fly under radar, take off and land instantly, and take a few hits. It just so happens that feet are the best landing gear.
>I don't know what point you're trying to make by bringing up something that's even more moronic, but okay.
It makes all space trucking games just as unrealistic as mecha games, pure wish fulfilment, and it's not a bad thing. Just like very popular "tank-on-tank" genre.
Otherwise all we have is drones and artillery, and everything more is a copping zone.
>If we could have built Armored Core, we would have used it yesterday.
And it would be immediately discontinued once it became clear it's a comically impractical waste of money and resources.
>and it's not a bad thing.
Yes it is.
>And it would be immediately discontinued once it became clear it's a comically impractical waste of money and resources.
But enough about. helicopters.
Helicopters are actually useful though. You keep trying to liken the nonsensical nature of mechs to real world vehicles that are actually practical, and it just makes you look like an idiot.
In logistic, maybe. US forces try to fit them in every hole, just because the military wants to use their big shiny toy. They are completely useless if the opponent has any form of parity. They're only useful in police operations.
They ate shit in two different yet equally pathetic Shitholestans.
You, in turn, have failed to attack even one of my arguments. You don't know enough yet you think you can make some kind of judgment.
Mechs could be nonsensical, yet you can't even defend your winning position.
At the end of the day, we can't predict the future even in the short term, an army can keep something completely useless in service for decades (A-10) and will use the weapon long after it is completely obsolete.
It's a clown world, and mechs fit in here.
>huuuuuuur being able to transport things by flight is completely useless!
Okay, keep on with your insane delusions that inherently moronic ideas could maybe make sens one day if the laws of physics magically change. moron.
You should invest in reading comprehension. It will do you well.
There's nothing to comprehend. You are spewing complete nonsense. You say I'm attacking any of your points? You don't have any points, and you're trying to claim that helicopters are useless. Frick you and die.
Dude, wake up. You can't read lol. You can't comprehend simple logic. Maybe this is why you are so aggressive. Dumbasses are like that.
Not that anon but mechs, or at the very least something with manipulators like how mechs have arms, is an incredibly practical device that adds more staying power to your fighting force. Your tank/helicopter/jet/humvee run out of ammo and it's time to head back to the base. Your giga armed vehicle runs out of ammo and it can start using the gun as a club, or chuck it as a projectile weapon, or start uprooting trees to chuck as projectile weapons. That means the ammo it started out with is one less factor that determines whether it stays in the field or goes back to HQ.
All the money required to make that monstrosity could be put into more soldiers and anti-material weapons. Oh wow, mechs have arms. You know what else they have? Outrageous maintenance costs.
have a nice day, coomer scum.
>You know what else they have? Outrageous maintenance costs.
Considering the only "real" source we have for mech maintenance costs are fees from videogames where cost is based on HP lost + solid ammunition spent, it can be anywhere between absoluitely free and more than a village worth of arms and a legs. I wouldn't really be talking about maintenance costs for the fictional vehicles.
Besides, expensive maintenance costs is a military staple. The training and maintenance cost for an Abrams tank can top up at $10 million bucks per tank, according to google.
>Besides, expensive maintenance costs is a military staple. The training and maintenance cost for an Abrams tank can top up at $10 million bucks per tank, according to google.
Yeah, and the tank doesn't have limbs, dumbass. If it did, it'd bankrupt the country.
>I wouldn't really be talking about maintenance costs for the fictional vehicles.
And here we start with this fricking shit. Just because it's fictional, that means it's perfectly okay for something to be idiotic nonsense. Frick you.
My guy, we have vehicles with rudimentary "not for chucking" limbs in the form of cranes, excavators, and even that thing that uproots trees to feed into those moving sawmills that they use in rainforests. None of those bankrupt the companies that employ them.
You'll have to explain the math you did where these devices that these companies use go from "we can use these in our company and earn profits" to "holy shit it's bankrupting a whole country" just because some engineers turned it into a trebuchet that can also grab stuff.
>None of those bankrupt the companies that employ them.
None of those things are able to walk and fly, moron.
Good thing I said "or at the very least, vehicles with manipulators akin to a mech's arms" then, didn't I?
Frick your backpedaling. Mechs are logistically unfeaseable. Period. And that's before we get to the part where they're physically impossible. I will never understand why you blithering morons are so adamant in defending this utterly stupid concept.
>"Because it's cool!"
No it isn't. There's nothing cool about nonsensical prostituteshit that literally cannot work under any circumstances.
It's not backpedaling moron. I outright specified the practical use of limb like manipulators for a military vehicle.
>And that's before we get to the part where they're physically impossible
We have literally been making weapons that throw things over great distances long before we invented tanks, like a catapult or a trebuchet. Impossible my ass.
>It's not backpedaling moron. I outright specified the practical use of limb like manipulators for a military vehicle.
And what happens when said manipulators are instantly shot off like the nice big target they are, dumbass?
>the moron is actually, ACTUALLY comparing catapults to giant fricking robots
... I can't. I just fricking can't with you subhumans.
How often do Abrams tanks with their "nice big target" axial guns get shot off?
> If it did, it'd bankrupt the country.
They had the resources to teach a tard like you to read. Couldn't be cheap. I think they'll be fine.
If this is your best argument you deserve to die and so does this thread.
Pathetic.
It's not an argument, it's objective fact. Mechs are nonsensical and do not belong in fiction because their depiction is a form of misinformation. That's simply how it is.
...anon, do you believe people think transformers are real when they watch/play the franchise?
They absolutely do. There are people who think Thanos is both real and had sound reasoning for fricks sake!
If Thanos was real he would have snapped you out of existence, also
>capeshit
Capeshit is the reason why people are so stupid that they unironically believe that this bullshit is real. Mechslop is threatening to bring about a second wave of mass delusion.
Apperently OP did. thats why he felt insulted
for being misinformed that mecha is fiction for fun and toys.
>their depiction is a form of misinformation
Autism
what a moronic thread
"why doesn't the fictional entity abide by real-life rules!!!"
it's fricking fiction
>"Just turn your brain off, bro!"
This is why video games are all shit now, because the "people" who play them have no standards.
have a nice day.
You first. You're the one who refuses to engage with the topic and instead got immediately butthurt that someone pointed out that your fictional toys make no goddamn sense.
Nta, but you should definitely end it all.
No seriously have a nice day.
>HOW THE FRICK DOES MARIO JUMP, SHOOT FIREBALLS, AND HAVE EXTRA LIVES?! VIDEO GAMES ARE CRINGE
Just have a nice day you joyless and mentally insecure moron.
>using your brain is a sign of insecurity
...
>resistant to all forms off attack
Unless you, y'know, bring a rope. Such a mighty machine until the stupid thing trips. moron.
That "rope" is going to have to be an extremely long carbon fiber tube or it's going to just immediately snap.
>using your brain is a sign of insecurity
You should certainly start doing it.
>using your brain to debunk stylized power fantasy fiction thats simply a narrative vehicle makes you a billion IQ gigachad
How about you start b***hing and moaning about magic not making sense, or space combat with giant battleships being a waste of resources over simple long range railgun ballistics delivery? Go wank off to leaked military blueprints and go back to playing War Thunder.
Why does it always boil down to "MUH FUN" with you brainless c**ts? I swear, at this point it's more a matter of you having no self-respect than anything.
Also, bold of you to make the assumption that any of that other shit is acceptable either.
The fact you think all fiction has to subscribe to one standard of reality makes you such a goddamn lolcow.
The fact you think it's okay for fiction to insult the audience's intelligence makes you a moronic sheep.
You must have such a fantastic variety of military sims and car games you like to play, dad.
>I hate fun
Cuckmann, is that you?
Answer the question, coward. It's extremely telling that you always justify games directly calling you a moron by citing "fun".
1 5 8 2 6 0 5 1 6 8 3 6 1 8 0 3 6
>still avoiding answering the question
I accept your concession, sheep.
>hurr you conceded
Nah anon. We provided you an argument. You just need to use your brain to decipher it. We wouldn't want to insult your intelligence, after all.
The only concessions you take are in the candy aisle at the supermarket.
I don't give a shit about whatever spergout you're having with that anon. I just chimed in and called you Cuckmann because of your whole thing against fun, like how he said "we don't use the word fun" over at Naughty Dog.
You don't want an answer, you sad little autist. You were just wanting validation for your shit takes.
>STILL avoiding answering the question
Why do you justify a game insulting your intelligence by citing "it's fun"?
Oh no. It appears you can't decipher the argument provided. Would you like us to dumb it down for you?
You are not providing an argument, you are continually avoiding answering a basic question.
And you are continually failing to understand a basic answer in spite of the replies doing their best to not insult your intelligence.
And you are now not even understanding the difference between a question and answer, GPT-kun.
I understand just fine moron kun. You asked us why people always respond with how something is fun, and bemoaning your perceived insult to our collective intelligence. You've been provided answers designed to not insult your intelligence, but the meaning behind them continues to elude you, as though we need to insult what intelligence you claim to have by dumbing things down to where an infant can understand.
A rhetorical question is a statement, not a question. It doesn't need to be answered.
However, I can certainly infer your IQ from the moronic way you "argue" i.e. by flinging shit and hoping your nonsense sticks.
Oh it's not a rhetorical question. I'm genuinely asking, but you're too much of a b***h ass coward to answer it.
You still haven't answered the question.
Wait a second... that posting style and arguments...I know who you are!
You are the mecha guy spamming that Nier Automata picture sperging, probably the same guy that spergs at crossovers and science fantasy.
Leave the thread, anons, this guy won't listen. No point arguing further.
This guy is amusingly moronic, anon. I don't think they even understand that they're autistically insinuating all fiction (no matter how unrelated) should adhere to a unified standard of physics, and that the whole point of fiction being a media to entertain and intrigue is NOT a valid excuse.
>insinuating
No, I'm outright saying that. Do not put this stupid shit in your story, period.
There is absolutely no scenario in which insulting the audience's intelligence is justified.
>There is absolutely no scenario in which insulting the audience's intelligence is justified.
And yet you're providing a scenario right now. You want all the puzzle solving removed from the responses provided to you because you couldn't figure out how the replies you received answered your question.
I don't want to solve some imaginary puzzle. I want you to tell me why you fricktarded sheep are okay with a work of fiction treating you like babies jingling keys in front of your faces.
have a nice day. You will never have the moral high ground because I can feel you desperately avoiding that Battlefield V post.
The fact that you think it's imaginary when you've been told countless times that it isn't does little to disprove that there are situations wherein your intelligence needs insulting.
>"If I keep saying that I'm not being a gaslighting c**t, that'll make it true!"
Okay, I accept your concession. You love the taste of corporate wiener, and honest discussion is a foreign concept to you. Y'know, it's really my own fault for trying to have a real conversation on this piece of shit website in the first place.
>My argument isn't wrong you're gaslighting me
And here's where I accept your concession. One day maybe you'll me smart enough to piece it together. I doubt it though.
Buddy, I got some bad news. I'm not the one who was talking to you about Battlefield V. Take your meds.
Again, why are you lying?
If you really did answer my question, you can damn well prove it by simply answering it again. But you literally can't because you fricking didn't. Go die.
>answer my question
>answer my question
>ANSWER MY QUESTION
hi broken record, my name is lol
>"A HUUUUUUUUR I LOVE WHEN GAME DEVS CALL ME A moron!! KEYS JINGLY A DUUUR HUUURR HUUUUURRRRRrrrrRRRRR*drool*"
have a nice day.
Anon, answering your question just proves us right by the fact that you had to have it spelled out for you instead of you being able to piece it together. In other words, it's to this threads amusement and mirth that you, Mr. "Grr you shouldn't like things insulting your intelligence" are now begging to have your intelligence insulted by asking to be spoonfed the answer.
So nah. figure it out by yourself and we'll keep laughing each time you say "no you didn't answer it, now answer me".
>"I know I have no real argument, so I'll just keep up this bullshit."
This is why you "people" have a containment board. Frick off back to /m/ already.
You already tried this with
You were wrong then and you're still wrong now.
>"Your objectively correct assertion that mechs are unrealistic is wrong because... because it just is, okay?!"
Uh huh.
I'm replying to him purely because it's funny to make him screech. Nothing more, nothing less.
Because I'm not so emotionally fragile like you to confuse my feelings for reason and take fictional universes as an affront to my very being to the point of argument if it acts as an entertaining means of framing a world and story in a genre of video game I like.
But I still don't think you wanted an answer, you just want to feel like your shit opinion matters on a Mongolian fish-fricking conference room.
Again, fiction is not an excuse to depict stupid shit. That is straight up misinformation, and that's immoral, dammit.
Not one word of that actually answered the question.
>Not one word of that actually answered the question.
The posts continuously have. Maybe you're just too dumb to understand the answer.
So fiction needs a disclaimer on it that it's fiction because someone might think clearly fictional concepts depicted within are based in reality and... do something?
...What are you even doing on Ganker.
Fiction needs to not have any of that shit in it at all.
Go ahead and answer the question again then.
>Go ahead and answer the question again then.
But if we did that you'd have to concede that there are situations where "insulting your intelligence" is a necessity, and I wouldn't want to do that. You'll have to piece the puzzle together on your own. It'll be more rewarding that way.
>Because I'm not so emotionally fragile like you to confuse my feelings for reason and take fictional universes as an affront to my very being to the point of argument if it acts as an entertaining means of framing a world and story in a genre of video game I like.
>meanwhile, pic related
... homie, why you lyin'?
The posts continuously have.
No they haven't. All you tards have said is essentially "NUH UH!" and failed to elaborate.
>No they haven't.
Yes they have anon. Come on, use that big so-called intelligent brain you have. You can piece the answer together.
>no mention of any kind of a new srw game or even a new fantranslation
Its so over...
This is a thread made by an autistic troll. This is not the real SRW thread you're looking for
>Terada still tweets stuff like "if I say anything OG related people wil start demanding the final game" even though he's not even in the company anymore.
Also, the moment he left marked the end of the franchise. It's forever gacha garbage now
Just goes to show that "manliness" is a hollow, meaningless concept.
And I feel like I've seen this exact tactic of desperately trying to avoid discussion before.
i feel like i've seen this thread before, this exact thread with the exact same talking points presented by OP
moronicly cool, yes.
Post Lamia's massive boobs.
Idk, what kind of weapon are you going to use when you're trying to defend and enforce land inside an O'Niell Cylinder, and any stray projectile could cause explosive decompression for the entire space colony?
Personally, I'd want something big with arms that can be used for both construction and melee combat, and legs capable of crossing any type of terrain, while being familiar and intuitive to control
>/m/tards don't know what a fricking turret is
What the actual frick is wrong with you "people"?
>pie in the sky delusion
>logic
Armored Shills need to be banned.
>Enemies get inside your space colony
Oh no, I guess I'll just politely ask them to leave
Average Mecha denier (Probably Canadian)
>space colony
>im-fricking-plying
Fricking hell, you morons keep piling on the stupid, huh.
>Ganker
>thinking
You didn't either when you made this post, so I guess you're right about one thing. Anyway gonna post my favorite SRW robot now.
were the SRW OGs ever fan translated?
OGs was.
It's faster to learn japanese yourself than waiting for a single SRW to be translated though.
>You ever think about how mechs are an inherently moronic concept?
Mechs are not an inherently moronic concept. The idea of an all terrain mobile weapon resistant to all forms of attack besides another one of itself is logistically extremely viable for warfare. In addition, the idea of a humanoid modular system that can be customized for virtually any type of mission further adds credibility for their viability.
Duh. Why do you think no real military has ever adopted them on a wide scale?
>the idea of a humanoid modular system that can be customized for virtually any type of mission further adds credibility for their viability.
>blow leg off
There goes your viability.
>There goes your viability.
You mean like how a chopper isn't viable anymore if you shoot its tail off? Or a tank ends up being a glorified turret if its treads get fricked?
Besides, if you're gonna b***h about mechs being "expensive" because they can walk and fly like you did in
then a mech with its leg blown off will just fly homie.
>You mean like how a chopper isn't viable anymore if you shoot its tail off?
Choppers aren't meant to be frontline armor units like tanks.
>Or a tank ends up being a glorified turret if its treads get fricked?
That's still better than a disabled mech.
>a glorified gun emplacement is better than a walking flying shooting thing that you just pissed off and made into a dedicated flying thing
The mind of tankgays, everyone.
Specialized units paired with other specialized units of different designs and specialties beat over-engineered jacks of all trades.
>2 things being crippled by shooting their ONE means of mobility is better than one thing that can still fight due to having 2 means of locomotion
The mind of tankgays, everyone.
New OG/SRW game when?
Mx translation onegai, i want my Rahxephon, Eva and Zeorymer mindfrick wienertail
Learn japanese.
I-im on it...
Good.
You ever wonder how autists like OP get to sleep knowing people like things they don't?
I think Lockheed Martin are ready to unveil the gundam and trying to pre-emptively discredit the opposition. Godspeed, god's tardiest warrior. Fricking rope, lol.
>2023 A.D.
>till no proper translation for the Alpha series (Gaiden doesn't count)
Kill me
I like the Gespenst.
Their usefulness varies, but they're charming at all levels.