You have RTX turned on, right? You arent poor are you?

You have RTX turned on, right? You aren’t poor… are you?

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No, I have an RTX 4090

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      4080 peasant here

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >30fps
    >1080p
    lol no thanks

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >40 fps
      >4k (native)
      >80 fps
      >4k (DLSS Quality)

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >4K (DLSS)
        Yeah, "4K".

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Soooo much more than you will ever have on your toaster

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >>80 fps
        >>4k (DLSS Quality)
        >4k

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >muh DLSS isn't real 4k
          I've posted many comparisons on here between them and you gays go silent every time

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          4k DLSS Quality looks better then native 4k gay

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Holy cope

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >facts are cope
              derp

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                ignoramus

                which is which?
                DLSS OFF , Quality , Performance
                Should be easy to spot, right?
                go...

                Look at all these retards making such a dumb fucking comment. Yeah guys smearing a pat of butter over your screen when you move looks way better than the native resolution
                >UH YEAH BUT CAN YOU TELL THE DIFFERENCE WITH MY CAREFULLY CHEERY PICKED SCREENSHOT?!?
                Of course not. It's in MOTION where DLSS will always look worse. Sometimes it's bad, sometimes it's not. But you can't fucking pretend that it is 1:1 indistinguishable. Are you fucking morons serious?

                Let's drop the facade I want to work for nvidia. I will shill way better than you stupid gays. Give me the job.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Also as a reminder anon claims it looks BETTER. Yeah, eat my ass. Dumbest post I've read from the shills yet. Apply yourself. You could have claimed it is basically 1:1 and you could maybe get away with it but fuck off if you think that upscaling ever looks better. I hate this place so much

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                as always it's the same old shit out of you people.
                >DLSS looks like smeared shit
                Here's some screen shots, which is which?
                >that's cherry picked
                here's more
                >they're .jpg, it's video you can tell
                here's a video
                >no, now I can't tell because youtube compression, we need 1:1 120fps 5GB files to spot it
                you're full of shit and wrong. If it's easy to spot then just spot it you retarded gay

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                moron I've watched vids. You can definitely pick it up. Distant objects can look worse. Highly fluid games sometimes get ghosting. Yet its still a fine way to play.

                The argument of anon was "Oh DLSS looks better than 4k" and if you say that then you are talking way out of your ass. Full stop. I already gave you shills your out -- I said it sometimes looks as good, sometimes it looks worse. If you wanna dig in then just go back to playing up scaled 1080p after all THERE'S NO DIFFERENCE. Fucking unreal that we are regressing to upscaling so nvidia can sell more cards. have a nice day.
                >t.used dlss, fsr, and 4k and can hardly tell the difference 90% of the time myself

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You stated that DLSS degrades during motion.
                I explained to you that it was DLSS3 which degrades during motion due to frame interpolation and that any blur from DLSS 2 was due to upscaling, as DLSS 2 doesn't add any frames. If you can see any blur with DLSS 2 then it'll appear during still images also.
                The images posted above use DLSS 2 so still images or video won't make any difference. It's either blurred you can see or not.
                So "moron" I don't give a fuck if you've watched a fucking youtube video.
                I don't give a fuck if you "think" it looks worse in motion.
                You are wrong, and when faced with a "put your money where your mouth is" challenge you just, as expected due to you gays being completely full of your own shit, side step it and blame some factor which isn't present to you.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm using a 3060Ti. You're full of shit. DLSS degradation during motion is well known. Digital Foundry mention it every fucking time they review a game.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I'm using a 3060Ti
                lol , how unlucky.
                >digital foundry says so
                lol , this is a troll isn't it?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Jesus Christ you typed out that shill spiel on a fucking phone. Why do you have the time to do something like that?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm using a 3060Ti. You're full of shit. DLSS degradation during motion is well known. Digital Foundry mention it every fucking time they review a game.

                It's not motion degradation, is de-occlusion degradation.
                All the reconstruction techniques including DLSS work by only drawing a certain number of pixels of the total picture every frame, then using the previous frames deformed to look like the current one plus the current one to deliver more total pixels.
                The problem arises when you have something on the new frame that was just not on the last frame, like if you had this shield covering part of the screen on the last frame but on this one the shield is not there.
                The whole "deforming the last frame" will fail and you will have to do something like just using the current pixels to fill in or let the AI bullshit the pixels up.
                It is some form of motion issue as the motion de-occlude things.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it's not motion
                >it's de-occlusion
                How is de-occlusion caused, anon?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                As i said on the last paragraph, it is caused by motion, but it's not quite the things moving that get degraded, but the things being revealed by the motion.
                DLSS3 do both.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                how many times does it take to tell you brain dead stupid cunts that you're talking about frame insertion on DLSS3 and not upscaling on DLSS 2.
                The images above from Metro: Exodus use DLSS 2 so nothing you've posted is relevant

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You stated that DLSS degrades during motion.
                I explained to you that it was DLSS3 which degrades during motion due to frame interpolation and that any blur from DLSS 2 was due to upscaling, as DLSS 2 doesn't add any frames. If you can see any blur with DLSS 2 then it'll appear during still images also.
                The images posted above use DLSS 2 so still images or video won't make any difference. It's either blurred you can see or not.
                So "moron" I don't give a fuck if you've watched a fucking youtube video.
                I don't give a fuck if you "think" it looks worse in motion.
                You are wrong, and when faced with a "put your money where your mouth is" challenge you just, as expected due to you gays being completely full of your own shit, side step it and blame some factor which isn't present to you.

                All this fucking a bloo bloo bloo over being told that dlss will never look as good as native 4k. Fucking get help.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >never looks as good as native

                show me

                which is which?
                DLSS OFF , Quality , Performance
                Should be easy to spot, right?
                go...

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nah. You and the other shills (same shill?) are being purposefully obtuse at this point. I don't even have to make the argument as I'm still waiting for the original poster to validate the "actually it looks better than native 4k" so go figure that shill talking point and maybe I'll get back to you.
                >already on file saying it can look as good but can also look as bad and nvidia shills still screech

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you made a statement saying it looks worse. The image posted has DLSS OFF, DLSS Performance and DLSS Quality.
                If it looks as bad as everyone makes out then spotting your DLSS Off should be a walk in the park.
                Not one person has actually posted yet. Strange that. Something you all claim is so easy to do yet nobody has even tried.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                HOLY SHIT gay I SAID IT LOOKS WORSE IN MOTION AND I'M NOT GONNA SIT HERE AND GO THROUGH EVERY FUCKING PIXEL ON AN IMAGE TO APPEASE YOU RETARDS. I'VE ALREADY MENTIONED THAT DLSS CAN AND REGULARLY DOES LOOK WORSE IN
                >fluid motion
                >distant details
                >textures can also look worse
                BUT CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR DIM LIT CHERRY PICKED SCREENSHOT NICE TO KNOW I CAN JUST RENDER MY GAMES AT 640 X 480 AND UPSCALE TO 4K AND IT'LL BE FINE WHY DIDN'T WE THINK OF THIS ON THE CONSOLE ERA WHERE WE SPENT A DECADE BITCHING ABOUT IT.

                Fucking have a nice day moron.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              ignoramus

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous
            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              which is which?
              DLSS OFF , Quality , Performance
              Should be easy to spot, right?
              go...

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                left looks the worst, not him btw and I like DLSS

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                To be fair, it's hard to spot visual degradation when using DLSS at 4K displays, especially on a still pictures (because moving objects is where DLSS & FSR shit themselves).

                Also I didn't come to shit on DLSS, I like it on my 3080, but it shouldn't be a bragging point because it makes you look like a retard. Brag about raw performance instead.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                once again , bullshit
                DLSS 2. Any blurring that occurs is due to upscaling
                DLSS 3. Any blurring occurs is due to frame insertion
                It's either/or , not both. Those images use DLSS 2 which doesn't insert frames and so shouldn't be motion blurred. What you see is what you get in stills and motion.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Hey omega shill, DLSS is a temporal algorithm. Show one video in motion, show how it looks darktide where a horde of enemies merges together into a single mush in the distance.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Jesus, what the fuck is up with that video? I think even pixelated vomit looks less blurry.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Should be easy to spot, right?
                >uses a lossly jpg instead of a lossless png
                nice try chang

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >says it's easy to spot
                >but can't spot it

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >this neural network does better the thing it's trying to emulate
            you are the ideal nvidia consumer

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >dlss quality
        literally missing the point. balanced is where it’s at

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >120fps
        >1080p (DLSS Quality, upscaled from 480p)

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >>4k (native)
        No modern games are actually native 4k. TAA, makes them closer to native 480p.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I do, but you're a retard for spamming moronic shill threads.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don’t think you have RTX turned on. In fact, I think you’re poor.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That's ok, you can think whatever you want.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >You have RTX turned on, right? You aren’t poor… are you?
    good morning sir, please redeem the card

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >dumb ESL
      Poo in the loo, thirdie

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Post your specs

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why do you think I play any of the trash AAA releases that use RTX?
    https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/confirmed-ray-tracing-and-dlss-games-2022
    Nothing on this list worth playing warrants me to purchase anything more than my 6800XT.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >radeon owner
      >i-it's all shit anyway
      Sour grapes my brother, sour grapes

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Sorry my friend but I think you're mistaken. I had a 3080 on order from microcenter for like $800. But then I looked at this list of games and went "wow, I'm not gonna play any of these other than metro exodus" so I bought a 6800XT for similar gaming performance and way less money.

        My stable diffusion performance isn't as good but nothing on this list warranted an extra $250 at 1440p. Frankly a lot of these games don't even use heavy raytracing my 6800XT can't run anyways (like metro)

        you as a pompous gay dont even want to play resident evil? thats just hard to believe.

        btw video enhancing is coming in february. it'll improve video quality on youtube most likely.

        You're right I am partially being a gay I guess I should say only a handful of games are worth playing but I certainly don't believe they warrant me to pay an extra markup to do so.

        I'll come back to ray tracing when 1440p 144fps rtx on is standard at an affordable price.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Also seriously fuck these prices I shouldn't have to pay four figures or $850 minimum for the next gen of gpus I'm not gonna fucking do that shit. The worst of it all is the fucking vacuum now between $400 and $800 in building a PC. There's fucking nothing. It's a barren wasteland. I'm not fucking supporting this crap to play fucking video games. Nvidia and AMD need to launch their mid range and unfuck their prices stat. What a crock of shit that they are getting away with

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Your poverty seems to have angered you.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I refuse to pay over MSRP for a gpu.

              >My stable diffusion performance isn't as good
              how long to render a 512x512 20 step image?

              Off the top of my head I couldn't tell you I just run it overnight but I think I get something like 7 IT/s if that helps . Is that "stellar?" no absolutely not. I think it performs like a 2070 or something. But I do it more just for the occasional fun and I'd probably take a 6800XT over anything nvidia puts out under the 3080 because of the better memory module. 8GB of ram is basically unacceptable for anything remotely interesting

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                nope not stella , cheers. I now know never to buy AMD

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah as I said I don't do it as more than just a hobby. I think ray tracing continues to be a meme but CUDA is no joke so if you need that then you are unfortunately locked in to nvidia. Novelty to me wore off for stable diffusion

                My work provides my hardware though for my cad work. I could probably use it but I don't think my IT guys would appreciate me generating hundreds of images of anime tits

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Oh yeah and as I said the dogshit vram out of some other cards kind of really nukes any value prospect of something like the 3070 or whatever so maybe 2070 super isn't even equivalent either.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >10 images in 10s
                LMAO it takes 5 min to generate 1 image on my 1050

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I think it took 300 seconds per image running on an i9 10900x CPU.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >My stable diffusion performance isn't as good
          how long to render a 512x512 20 step image?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Sounds like cope to me. I have a shitty 1060 3GB and can play non-AAA just fine. What are you doing buying anything more powerful if you aren’t playing the graphics hogs?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I game at 1440p and wanted the extra performance since I had the room in my budget. I'll still play some here and there, I'm just not losing my goo to play games with RTX on. You're missing the point -- it's that the games worth playing on this list aren't worth an extra $250. Even the 4090 still chugs on heavily ray traced games.

            So why bother? I'll buy into rtx when it becomes standard and the price equivalent of a 3060 or 3070 can run them just fine. I bought a card that will perform everything I need at max settings RTX off and even the rtx on games will perform pretty okay as well. If I fell for the "oh it's only a bit more for something better" my build would be $3000. I set a budget, I didn't wanna pay over MSRP, and nvidia pisses me off. That simple.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you as a pompous gay dont even want to play resident evil? thats just hard to believe.

      btw video enhancing is coming in february. it'll improve video quality on youtube most likely.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fellow 6800 XT king, I managed to score one for about 459.99 back when GPU prices were plummeting for AMD cards right before new gen launched. Absolutely loving it, by far the most powerful gaming GPU I've ever owned. Takes a hefty shit on my old 1070.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Hitman is good.

      It's also one of the games that RTX has the least impact because it actually has good non-RT reflections. One of these pics has RT and the other doesn't. I can't remember which is which

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        bottom is rtx, it's extremely clear because the reflections are far clearer even when it doesn't make sense for them to be.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        looks awful, why would wood become glass? Even if you polish it it would never be that reflective i guess they have never in entire life visited any museum.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous
        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          anon, just because you live in filth and have never seen polished wood before that wasn't in your hands, doesn't mean it isn't a real thing

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This post is fucking undefeated still, holy fucking shit.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >flight simulator 2022 RTX on

      what the fuck are they talking about, there is no "ray tracing" setting in this game, theres a dx12 mode which added some better lighting i guess but it also is unstable and crashes a lot, and then theres DLSS

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes but I'm gonna have to disable it for a couple of weeks. My 4080 keeps crashing games to the desktop. I was hoping it was drivers but my friend just got a 4080 himself we were able to test with and it didn't have issues in my system. Nvidia finally just started the RMA process after two weeks of troubleshooting so it'll probably be a week or two before they get me a new one.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ahhh raytracing
    next "killer feature" that isnt optimized properly and at the moment made only for selling new cards
    you know ray tracing used to an inside joke, that nobody would be so stupid to attempt at making it reality, that it would be the most expensive overengineered crap nobody would buy

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The killer feature you can't run so you cry about it being shit

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        nobody can run it, retard.
        if you need a massive brick of a graphics card that costs thousands of dollars, it's not a viable technology. every other RTX card struggles at pumping out smooth 120+ fps gameplay at even 1080p.

        real time ray tracing is a meme. it's obviously pushed by the industry to make you believe your perfectly capable 1080 is already obsolete. also, no games using real time ray tracing actually look any better than if they'd be done with traditional raster graphics. it's so embarrassing that the big RTX demo that relies entirely on real time ray tracing has to be showcased on portal, a game takes place 100% in incredibly simple and boxy rooms.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >nobody can run it, retard.
          Apart from the people who do.
          > costs thousands of dollars
          Stop reading at that point. That's the issue. You can't afford something so it's pointless tech. The rest if just you trying to validate to yourself that your shit GPU isn't shit.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            name ONE game that looks good because it uses 100% ray tracing.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >name one so I can say it's shit and think i've done a big "gotcha"

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you still have not named one game. thanks for proving me right

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, I'm poor. I'm just researcher at National institute with doctorate in applied physics but this isn't USA so I'm both earning less than clerk at grocery store and society thinks I'm useless.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No need considering shadow mapping has been basically perfected.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's still too expensive, still not worth the entry price regardless of wealth.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    hello mr nvidia employee
    do the needful and warn everyone to turn on their ray tracing on
    if they don't call them bitch bastard

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sus

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      more of these memes. disappointing to enter the thread.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      better version

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I have rtx 3070. Tried it. It's a meme that eats a lot of fps.
    I'd rather play at 144 fps than have this gimmick. Also in some games RTX is so shit it has GHOSTING (re7)
    DLSS is also meme.
    The only reason to buy Nvidia is for good drivers. Don't be jealous ayymd-fags, you won't losing much.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >has near lowest performing RTX card
      >It runs like shit guys. You don't need it.
      lool

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It runs alright. I play at 1440p, I have 90 fps in resident evil 7 at max settings with rtx.
        I prefer stable 144 fps and NO FUCKING GHOSTING.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >It runs alright.
          >NO FUCKING GHOSTING.
          if you got ghosting it didn't run alright. It was struggling.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's not fps or card issue. Stop shilling fag.
            I've looked it up, people with rtx 3090ti also had this issue.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >knee jerk calls people a shill rather than accept a 3070 is a shit ray tracing card
              lol , I've never seen any ghosting with a 2080ti, 3090 or 4090. I've seen a slight delay in illuminated colour when you stand next to a changing billboard in cyberpunk, but nothing which would make me turn against using RT.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Trying to talk about top-tier technology in a sea of poorfags and even worse on an anime board where most people are lowlife degenerates stuck 10 years in the past

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Just so you 2% = 560,000 people

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Every single speecy/hwinfo thread exposes this boards as poorfags, which is why they hate RTX

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        One day RTX will be possible even on a dirt cheap AMD card. Why not just wait for that kek? Probably two gens out. It's experimental tech that use the same few games as justification.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          RTX isn't at all necessary with how good shadow mapping has gotten. Just an excuse for nvidia to keep prices high.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    depends if it's just meme shit like ray traced shadows / reflections or full blown global illumination
    the latter is the only thing that's worth the dramatic fps hit

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, and I get 150+ frames per second for Doom Eternal on my Acer Predator Helios 300 that has an Nvidia RTX 3070Ti and a 240Hz display, all maxed out.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i have it on and i'm not poor, but i'm too busy laughing at people who think a $1k GPU is a symbol status to actually play vidya

    it's a hard life

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No because I hate the anti-christ you fucking shill.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I want to live in this alternate reality where there are RTX games that are actually worth playing to make a card like the 4090 worth buying

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Nvidiots eat up old console technology now

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I game at 8k.

    You do too, I hope?

    Wait..

    You aren't.... poor, are you?

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >DLSS
    yes
    >RT
    holy shit no

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Now on my 2nd ray tracing capable card
    >Most people are Indian PC tier and still on 1650s and other shit tier cards with 10 year old cpus and 250GB HDDs
    >PC gaming will never reach its full potential because of poorfags

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      more like PC gaming will never reach it's full potential because game devs and artists stagnated in the last 10 years.

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I like the best of both worlds. ie 1440p instead of low res 1080p or low fps 4k. So I don't use either dlss or rtx on my 3070.

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Literal meme that makes 99% of games look no different and the ones that have updates for it completely ruin their aesthetic.

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    4080 peasant sadly.

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >game devs realize 20 years ago that real time raytracing is retarded, it's 100x more efficient to pre calculate the ray tracing and bake it into the level and use clever tricks to simulate the dynamic lighting where it's needed.
    >current year
    >nVidia garden gnomes realize that nobody is upgrading cards anymore because graphics stagnated and that a card from 5-6 years ago is perfectly viable for high fps and high res.
    >what if we sell retards the luxury of rendering the ray tracing of their own games in REAL TIME?
    >what? no of course it doesn't have to even make a noticeable difference, it only has to shit on the performance so the goym buy our cards.

    i have not seen ONE game that actually looks incredibly photo realistic because it uses real time ray tracing.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >i have not seen ONE game that actually looks incredibly photo realistic
      This.
      If raytracing fags actually believed in what they say they would post pics of games showing how incredibly good they can look now due to RTX. In reality, 99% of games look 99% the same but at a lower frame rate.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        meanwhile you're drawn to DLSS and Ray Tracing threads because you want to tell everyone that it's shit, while not being able to run it yourself. Weird isn't it.
        The people who can run it say it's great while the people who can't , like yourself, think it's shit.
        It looks more like sour grapes to be honest.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          post one pic. literally one. i'm on these threads to warn people not to fall for the raytracing meme like i did.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            why? so you can simply dismiss it, that's what you're going to do no matter what gets posted.
            So you're here to tell people not to fall for ray tracing as you did when you bought your 3060ti GPU , lol. If you bought a 3060 for Ray Tracing you're bigger tit than I thought. That's hilarious

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              so you can convince me, retard. didn't read past your first sentence. in the meantime, i accept your concession.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >no pics

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >you want to tell everyone that it's shit, while not being able to run it yourself.

          NOBODY can run raytracing. Even at 1080p on a 4090 you're going to get sub-60 fps. At which point you need to turn on DLSS which causes visual artifacts and input lag. It's not remotely worth the performance impact.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            DLSS visual artifacts.
            Show me. Which one is DLSS off ?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Show it in motion you dumb moron

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                DLSS 2 isn't DLSS 3 you stupid cunt. It doesn't add frames , it upscales. It won't make a difference if it's moving or not.
                Which is DLSS off?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Are you fucking daft? It's using extrapolation on every frame. Hell yes it matters in motion.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                question. answer it.

                which is which?
                DLSS OFF , Quality , Performance
                Should be easy to spot, right?
                go...

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They look the same on my smart phone screen. Which one looks better than native? Can I see them all in motion?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                imagine being this fucking new to DLSS and shilling it regardless

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >refuses to answer simple question
                >repeats incorrect stupid shit none stop
                >accuses others of shilling when stupidity is pointed out
                let me guess, you came from neogaf or resetera?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not the other guy but keep seething. I love it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Even DLSS 2 adds input lag you smooth brain retard.

                It also matters when it's moving because you get a shit ton of ghosting and smears. So stop taking static screenshots and acting like you're proving anything.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                those goalpost shifts
                >it looks smeared and blurry
                show me
                >it only happens in video
                lol
                >it's input lag
                ha ha

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >makes retarded point
                >gets btfod
                >y-y-y-youre moving the goalposts!!!

                Cope, seethe, and dilate.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                ha ha, that's motion blur you stupid cunt. that's not caused by DLSS , that occurs when DLSS if off too.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Right

              Easy

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Try it without using a compressed as shit .jpg, or better yet a video, and this will be much easier. That being said, judging by the aliasing: middle is native, left is quality, and right is performance.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >d right is performance.
                no.
                Left is Quality. Middle is Performance and right is Off

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Try it without using a compressed as shit .jpg, or better yet a video, and this will be much easier. That being said, judging by the aliasing: middle is native, left is quality, and right is performance.

                Look at the artifacts around this dude. This is obviously DLSS on performance or a jpg artifact.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Try it without using a compressed as shit .jpg,
                >I would have got the easy to spot shitty DLSS if only it wasn't a .jpg.
                lol

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Interesting you bring it up because games with RTX as an option look worse without it than games that have it because of that I notice.

      None of this looks sny different than just throwing an ENB on Skyrim to me

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    NO BECAUSE I FUCKING WORK FOR A LIVING AND DON'T LIVE OFF OF DADDY'S MONEY YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT, YOU FUCKING VAMPIRE, TRYING TO FEEL SUPERIOR BECAUSE YOU'RE MORE OF A WHORE TO CAPITAL THAN THE REST OF YOUR PEERS, YOU'RE A HUSK OF A MAN, BUT WORSE, YOU KEEP WASTING WATER, FOOD AND AIR THAT OTHER, MORE DESERVING PEOPLE COULD USE TO BECOME ACTUAL FUCKING HUMANS. FUCK YOU.

    I prefer AMD.

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    3090ti chad here, playing everything on ultra settings, 1440p and NEVER turning gay tracing on, it's a meme made to fool idiots into thinking shit lighting that kills your frames are good, maybe this can work on retarded consolemorons who think upscalling from 720p is good.

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No, I don't, and yes, I am.
    I'm pretty content with my 10708gb, honestly. I think some time 2024 or 2025 I'll probably make a new build and turn my current one into a home media server setup, but for right now, I don't really play anything that can even USE rtx, nor am I interested in it. I won a ps5 from a work raffle and ended up got a year of ps+ in the most recent sale so I'm mostly just playing through all the games I get in that sony games pass thing. It's pretty good so far, trying out bloodborne and demons souls for the first time, they're amazing

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    > Old Ganker complained games didn't do reflections
    >Raytracing solves this
    >Noooooo gaytracing sucks! My 1060tix+ is still top of the line!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They just meant they wanted planar reflections, like the older games including glquake and mario 64 did instead of doing retarded broken mirrors.

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    none of the games I play have this feature, so no, I don't have a choice.

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    real time reflections are already easy to with raster graphics (screenspace, parallax cubemaps, etc), so it makes me wonder what the fuck is the point of real time ray tracing? baked in lighting already uses ray tracing and everything else that's not baked in can easily be done with raster. the only thing i can think of is that the bounce lighting can now be in real time but no games even utilize this. what a waste of everybody's time

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You could tell me this skyrim screenshot had raytracing on and I'd believe you

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Thats because thats a good reflection angle for screen space reflections.
        Even then it is a bit hacky. The rock in the middle should obscure more of those trees, but it doesn't. The rocks and ground on the right edge also aren't right at all. You notice more of those details the more you look.

        Ray traced reflections really shine when they are reflecting things behind your camera that can't be faked by screen space or being static props.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Virtually every element of current gen raster rendering pipelines could be massively upgraded by using ray tracing. Let's look at shadows for instance.
      With shadow maps, you literally cannot have pic related happen. It's physically impossible. At best you have some approximation of distance based variable penumbra filtering happening, but when you have a closer object's shadow overlap with a distant one's, the closer one will just become lost in the farther one's shadow because there is no distinguishing between closer or farther in the shadow map texture, so everything gets blended together in an awful way.
      With ray tracing, you can have those darker sharper shadows from a closer object exist inside the penumbra of a distant object's shadow and it just works. Not to mention that ray traced shadows can influence a LOT more objects than shadow maps without an additional performance hit.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        right so anyway about the gameplay this helps for my VIDEOGAMES

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You dumb fucking moron. VIDEOgames, we play VIDEOgames. Not TEXTgames or SOUNDgames. Visuals play a critical role in how we experience games. If you're too poor to appreciate all the advances we have today then go back and play text based adventure games you dumb fucking ESL 3rd worlder.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            and this is the proof that this thread has been overrun by shills. As if you needed any more proof
            >What are you, poor? Can't afford to spend $2k on my fancy juicy 4090?
            I remember when I first got into PC gaming I was into it because the cost of gaming was such a good value over buying an overpriced console. Who would have thought that buying a console would make more sense in 2023? Wild fucking times

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Consoles were NEVER a more expensive option over PCs. This is some serious fucking cope. All those "cheaper than console" builds that you 3rd worlders love so much, always were and forever always will be utter garbage. PC gaming is the Ferrari of gaming. You don't buy a beaten up, decades old Ferrari with a hundred thousand miles on it that's filthy and broken down, and pretend you're getting something good out of it because it was cheap.
              You're just proof that PC gaming has been infested with poorfag morons like yourself for far too long, and it's finally time for the great purge to occur. Get fucked gay.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Oh no I agree but the overall value worked out better because pc games are cheap. Good PC was maybe 2x top the MSRP of a console at one point. Now you need 3x the MSRP of a PS5 just to build a lower mid grade build. Fucking unreal really

  35. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No, I don't like extra realism in vydia. My prefrontal cortex can comprehend pure fiction environment just fine

  36. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't think I've played a single game where I could actually turn it on.

  37. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Well I don't know about you guys but thanks to the hard work and effort of the totally not nvidia paid shill team, I now see that I need a 4090 to play video games. What a steal, all these great features I am leaving on the table if I don't pay $850 for a card with a gimped vram setup or $1200/$1600.

    Aren't you guys glad that this is where the industry has gone?

  38. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >DLSS shills really are telling me they can't see the difference between the images here
    >Actually DLSS looks better than native, bros!!!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >unsaved image
      how the fuck did you send it then?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I willed it into existence by using the stable diffusion installed in my brain.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >1920x1080
      I see your problem.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Image quality is important
      >plays at 1080p

  39. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    PS2 graphics were enough... from then on everything has gone to hell because of your muh graphics. I'm not interested in the nth copy pasted open world with slightly improved lighting that requires US$1000+. I DON'T GIVE A FUCK. God, zoomer gamers surely are all retarded.

  40. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    FSR is as good as DLSS and I don't need to pay nvidia to use it

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      FSR its better since you can upscale any game, even games that have a locked resolution

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I've used both and I have to say if Darktide is anything to go by they're gonna hurt gaming more than doing good. Every incompetent dev out there is not gonna bother optimizing their game and just assume people are going to turn upscaling on.

  41. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    rtx 3080, 32gb ram, 2tb SSD, 10850k i9 CPU

    witcher 3 runs like garbage with rtx on
    cyberpunk runs decent now but i didnt have this computer when it came out and it seemed to have a pretty rough launch

    metro exodus runs great

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I play Witcher 3 at 60 FPS on my 1080p TV with an Xbox controller and my 4080, everything turned on and maxed out

  42. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    wait is RTX just a catch all phrase now for either DLSS OR ray tracing?

    thats fucking stupid

  43. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >PLEASE CONSUME AND USE MY MEME AI GIMMICK THAT KILLS YOUR FRAMERATE I WANT TO SAVE MONEY INSTEAD OF PUTTING TIME DOING PROPER LIGHTING WORK AND HELP garden gnomeVIDYA SELL MORE HARDWARE
    kys garden gnome publisher shill.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well you certainly convinced me not to use DLSS, and you don't come across as a weird fucker at all.

  44. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >memetracing
    Sorry, I don't do memes

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Here's exhibit B. Notice how it kills your FPS, forcing you to rely on fake frames.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Have you noticed that you're spending your time trying to convince people not to use something you've never tried yourself?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Doesn't make my argument any less valid you retard.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            but does show you to be a clueless retard

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >call shit shit
              >NOOOOOOOOO YOU HAVEN'T EATEN SHIT SO YOU CAN'T CALL IT SHIT
              retard

  45. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Wasting money on the annual nvidia fuckup
    Couldnt be me.
    See you at the 5070 release.

  46. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    RTX OFF if it's a remastered game. ON if RTX was built in the game from the start.

  47. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nobody is

  48. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >nvidia proprietary shill thread on Ganker
    >locked out every gen out their own fucking gimmicks
    >not able to render native anymore
    imagine the abomination behind the fucking screen

  49. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    oh boy another graphics setting i didn't even know was missing in my life to warrant spending money on hardware!

  50. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I do not support garden gnomes so no, I don't have RT enabled

  51. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >DLSS looks like shit in motion
      >posts still screenshots
      do they pay you to make an ass of yourself?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        and if a video does get posted then suddenly you can't tell because of the video compression.
        It's always an excuse on why you can't see it.
        >can't see it on .jpg, need .png
        >can't see it on .png, need mp4
        >can't see it on .mp4, need FFV1
        You can't see a difference because the difference is miniscule. But you can't accept that, you just blindly parrot whatever some youtuber gay tells you

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >what are lossless codecs
          try harder.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            how about you show something in 4k lossless which looks terrible with DLSS2 but great without.

  52. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If I wait long enough, I will be able to buy a whole new PC more powerful than my current system for less than the cost of a current-day budget graphics card.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *