>be chromatic dragon. >not evil

>be chromatic dragon
>not evil

this is dnd in 2022+
uhh cosmic forces bros?...

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >not FUCKING the green dragon
    Gay

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      eww too human for me

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >t. Forgotten Realms Fag
    you do not play games

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    begs the question why the dragon must be destroyed in this setting.

    If you change the aspect of something, but keep the implications from the original aspect, its kinda moot.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >begs the question why the dragon must be destroyed in this setting

      There are no "good ones"

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        same with you dragon slayers

        fuck off racist

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I dunno, the one in OP's pic seems like an alright dude

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That could unironically be a fun plotline.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >begs the question why the dragon must be destroyed in this setting
      He's funding interracial porn and pro-open borders magistrates.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So, the dragon isn't evil, and because he's not evil, he's funding interracial porn and pro-open border policies?

        Are you suggesting those policies are good, and for that, the dragon must die?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Incorrect. He's not committing illegal acts and has an outwardly philanthropic, but he's still evil because his scaly, longsnouted kind are evil by default and so he commits surreptitiously evil acts designed to erode the nation over generations instead.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The premise here is that the dragon is not evil.

            By saying "Well he is actually evil" you're violating the entire point of the discussion.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              No, the premise is he isn't acting evilly. At least not outwardly so.

              [...]
              It's not a chromatic dragon, you goofs, it's just a dragon that's green, the traditional dragon color. In order to be "chromatic" and inherently evil, this would have to be a D&D setting, and we have no reason to assume that's the case. Dragons predate D&D, you know.

              [...]
              I don't think OP is self-aware enough to make that analogy.

              [...]
              [...]
              Go back to 4chan with your braindead Le garden gnomez memes. Most people don't see your dogwhistles and simply assume, correctly, that you're a fucking moron.

              Whoa there, who even mentioned gnomish folx? Don't you think it's a little antisemitic to see an oversized lizard with a wicked snout, a tendency to steal and hoard the treasures of others, and collapse a society from within and instantly think "da jooce"?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're not as subtle as you think you are. Everyone knows 4chantards dogwhistle and then play innocent. You're not owning the libs; you're just reminding everyone that rightoids are not only intellectually deficient but also can't argue in good faith if their miserable lives depended on it.
                Go back. Everyone hates you; most people just don't bother feeding the trolls.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Seriously, you shouldnt either.
                These guys unironically think they are owning you right now, they are happy being like this.
                You know the thing about wrestling pigs? You always lose. You both get covered in mud but the pig likes it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're right, of course. I generally try to avoid the mud but I just get so tired of the incessant 4chanposting. First it was eternal summer, now it's eternal election season.
                AllSoTiresome.jpg

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You're not as subtle as you think you are. Everyone knows 4chantards dogwhistle and then play innocent.
                The amount of projection on display here is impressive.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Leftists, women, and European-style socialists always project.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If you're getting this assblasted over some illegal immigration bait then you're probably dumber than the baiter

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You ain't slick, anon

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're not as subtle as you think you are. Everyone knows 4chantards dogwhistle and then play innocent. You're not owning the libs; you're just reminding everyone that rightoids are not only intellectually deficient but also can't argue in good faith if their miserable lives depended on it.
                Go back. Everyone hates you; most people just don't bother feeding the trolls.

                The j*ws wish they were as powerful as fantastical dragons. It's retarded to draw comparisons between the two.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I dunno, Bezos is pretty powerful

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Bezos is Catholic.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Interracial Porn
        So long as it's Human Male on Dragon Female, he's fine in my books.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's all orc male on human or elf female.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >begs the question why the dragon must be destroyed in this setting.
      He’s not actually a dragon. He’s the rightful heir to the throne, cursed by his sibling to embody the form of a monster (with none of the strength and durability) as part of a plan to take his seat as king. This is also why a group of relative novices (the players) are being sent to kill a fucking dragon. Everything’s a fucking lie.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Clearly the king despises the dragon for upsetting the economy of the kingdom. If he gives out free food, what will motivate peasants to work? If he educates peasant children, they’re going to get ideas about having human rights or not want to work menial jobs when they grow up!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The king is pretty shitty and there have been rumblings of revolution. The dragon has begun to perform these charitable acts as part of a long term plan to win the support of the people before they attempt to overthrow the king.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >begs the question

      It raises the question. Learn the difference.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        no, the implication is that it begs, seeing how its refered to as a beast and the premise seems to be calling on the idea of dragons as evil for its punchline.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You are a fucking retard

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Exception, not the rule. A true hero would argue in defense of something trying to change its ways, but hold that creature to its change and stay vigilant.

    In fact, in this scenario it might well be that such a dragon would draw a greater threat of other chromatics who don't share its views and wish to stomp it out as an aberration of its kind.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/mRrhhz8.png

      >be chromatic dragon
      >not evil

      this is dnd in 2022+
      uhh cosmic forces bros?...

      It's not a chromatic dragon, you goofs, it's just a dragon that's green, the traditional dragon color. In order to be "chromatic" and inherently evil, this would have to be a D&D setting, and we have no reason to assume that's the case. Dragons predate D&D, you know.

      [...]

      I don't think OP is self-aware enough to make that analogy.

      >begs the question why the dragon must be destroyed in this setting
      He's funding interracial porn and pro-open borders magistrates.

      Incorrect. He's not committing illegal acts and has an outwardly philanthropic, but he's still evil because his scaly, longsnouted kind are evil by default and so he commits surreptitiously evil acts designed to erode the nation over generations instead.

      Go back to 4chan with your braindead Le garden gnomez memes. Most people don't see your dogwhistles and simply assume, correctly, that you're a fucking moron.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >screeches at one political analogy but approves of its opposite
        How very draconic of you.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >all analogies are equally accurate and relevant
          How very 34 IQ of you

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Please don't be anti-semitic. I know you're better than that.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There's been non-evil chromatic dragons for decades.

    Eberron, for example.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ebberon is a shitty steampunk setting set in Victorian London.

      Not DND.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        not tru retard

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          [citation needed]

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            dessusy

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Eberron
      That's why it's a shitty mary sue setting

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They're huge, have scales as tough as iron, hoard vast amounts of metals, are greedy, can fly, and belch forth fire and smoke. The only foe that can defeat them is a hero of agrarian traditionalism (ie knights). They basically represent of evil of industrialization.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      We had this conversation before anon, knights are one of the furtherest things away from being "heros of agrarian traditionalism"

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >knights are one of the furtherest things away from being "heros of agrarian traditionalism"
        Maybe if your conception of hero is the capeshit kind.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You can really only have knights as we know them in an unindustrialized kingdom though, as soon as industrialization renders mass conscripted armies feasible they're doomed to irrelevance.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          ok tolkien fag

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          When that is somewhat true, that doesn't mean they're "heroes of agrarian tradition", correlation is not causation. Industrialization killed the concept of knights because it also weakened the concept of monarchy and nobility, which was the main driving force and main perpetrator of them.
          All knights had to be noble blooded or rich influental people serving the state and church, not "traveling heroes famous among farmers and in small villages". The legends were mainly told in the higher class, in order to push lords and their sons to respect the religious orders/crusades, and to support and join them, hence why the main source of the stories come from Renaissance ROMANCE literature. You think farmers liked to read and spread sappy love stories about the knight who falls in love with the princess?
          Knights were heroes of feudal/noble traditionalism, not agrarian.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Feudal/nobles are agrarian, where do you think they got their money? All medieval feudal economies were primarily agrarian in basis. More powerful landed knights would have a fief or fiefs of their own which they would he responsible for protecting.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >responsible for protecting.
              For taxing, you mean.
              Feudal/nobles relied on exploting agrarian economy, they literally viewed those who worked there as lesser, "lowborn". Being a serf was way worse than a regular farmer, since they didn't even own the land they worked, they were the closest things to wagecucks that isn't modren. Using the police enforcers of that system as a metaphor for "heroes that represent them against industrialism!" is pure irony.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You think farmers liked to read and spread sappy love stories about the knight who falls in love with the princess?
            Yes. Medieval peasants loved feudalism. It's why they had to be literally forced into the cities to work in factories when industrialization happened.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >on my honor I will kill the beast
    >does not kill the beast
    This man has no honor, like a woman.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    stop spamming dragon threads

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >serving probably adulterated soup
    >growing GMO crops
    >indoctrinating kids with draconic propaganda
    How is this not evil

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Have you tried not playing DnD?

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Here's an alternate alternative.
    >Be chromatic dragon
    > it's not an outright unsufferable bastard

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fucking dragon story hour is degenerate and teaching degeneracy to our children, exposing them to dragons at an inappropriate age.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I guess since this is somewhat about alignments and I'm not starting another thread, what philosophies would describe differently alignments? Using 1st edition definitions.
    >CN Epicureanism
    Your own pleasure is paramount and only good. But you can't experience it of you are in jail or exiled or if you overindulge.
    >TN or NG Taoism
    The way is natural, spontaneous, and indescribable. If you follow it you will be in harmony with the world. Do not and bad stuff happens not just to you but to the world around you.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    based on this poll, most people don't veiw dragons as evil.

    Most people voted good.

    does that upset you?

    https://strawpoll.com/polls/NoZrLKDQGn3

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Cutefat, commit sudoku.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Im not a cutefag. I just want to see people's opinions.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes you are. You made a very similar thread a few hours ago, with this exact post, which was deleted, and then you made another one.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            ok, I like making polls. how does that make me a cutefag?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Because you're trying to manufacture a false consensus that anyone actually likes your repetitive autistic "what if monster, GOOD?" posting.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I've asked all over Ganker, execpt /c/

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >be a never-game
    >still post on /tg/
    Why are you like this?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *